Alien vs. Predator
***
out of ****

The devil must be passing
out snow cones, because here is a positive review for Paul
W. S. Anderson’s Alien vs.
Predator. That it’s coming from me is something
of a semi-miracle, when you consider my history with the two
franchises that it is bringing together, which I’ll explain
below. Despite my initial hesitation, I found the film working
for me because of its ability to create exciting action sequences
that bring to mind the best of these franchises in a way that
isn’t too rushed or obvious.
The film had a lot against it coming from me. Of course, I
think the first Alien is a great film and Aliens,
its sequel, is a very good one. I even kind of liked Alien
3 and Predator. But Alien: Resurrection and Predator
2 were certainly major disappointments that I didn’t
care to see the first time around, let alone again. Paul W. S.
Anderson is also not my favorite director—horror spectacles
like Resident Evil and Event Horizon were interesting
visually, but were basically mindless fluff. That these two franchises
were finally coming together under the helm of an underwhelming
director seemed like overkill to me. It wasn’t.
A brief word for the uninitiated: The Alien series
concerned a woman’s ferocious and obsessive battle with
a race of shiny, beetle-like extraterrestrials that had acid
for blood and hideous pinchers on their tongues. Using the dark,
obsessive themes of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and Nostromo as
inspiration, the films were less about the aliens and more about
people’s obsessions to either use them for weapons or destroy
them. The point was always the characters’ reactions to
the creatures, and the films were all physiologically complex
essays on human behavior (or at least they tried to be). Still,
they generated plenty of scares—the aliens are pretty terrifying
beasts, and Sigourney Weaver as Ellen Ripley made for an effective,
mad hero. By the end, the series had run out of steam, but Weaver’s
presence and the alien’s menace made at least the first
three films thoroughly watchable.
The Predator films
had slightly less ambition, but the first film was an entertaining
flick that worked on its own terms. Genre fans call it a masterpiece,
and while I personally found it a bit overrated, it was is
still a good showcase for the macho, shoot-em up blend of fantasy
and thrillers that were popular in the 1980s. It certainly
didn't have the wit or intelligence of other films in that
era—say, Blade Runner, The
Terminator, Highlander, or even Aliens,
but it was cleverly done and engaging while it lasted. In my
book, the first Predator film was A-OK.
However, unlike the multi-themed Alien films, the
premise that Predator set up brought a problem to ensuing
follow-up films. The idea of a high-tech, hunter-killer alien
who collects skulls as trophies in a jungle, matching up with
Earth's biggest biceps (Arnold Schwarzenegger himself) was an
entertaining idea, and it worked. Its story, however, left no
other possible outlets for expansion. No matter what else we
could learn about the Predator's personality, no matter how his
weapons changed, no matter where the location was relocated to,
any sequel would just be a re-hash. It would just be Predator
2: Same Story With Bigger Guns in a New Location. Unlike
the Alien saga, Predator had only one story
to tell, and though it was told well, a sequel would be unnecessary.
Yet inevitably, a sequel came anyway, and yes, it was a rehash
of the first one. It was competently made and had cooler weapons
(the flying razor-disc was especially inventive), but it brought
no new twists to the formula. What it did do, however, was spark
an idea that fans of the genre have speculated on ever since.
In Predator 2’s final scenes, the hero finds the
hunter-killer’s space ship, containing many of his extraterrestrial
trophies. Among them was—you guessed it—a Ripley
alien. This was originally intended as a throwaway gag on the
producers’ parts, but fans liked what they saw and caught
on.
The
rest is history. Fifteen years later, Alien vs. Predator is
a geek phenomenon. There are countless comic books, novels, video
games, action figures, trading cards, and possibly even breakfast
cereals (I’ll have to check. Better yet, why don’t
you?). The fans rank in the millions, and they dream about possible
films that bring the two malevolent E.T.s together. Of course,
these geeked-out fanboys expected the film to follow the comic
books, video games, etc. to some degree, and their hype about
this film is pretty astronomical.
That said, Anderson did the best thing with his take on Alien
vs. Predator by completely ignoring the previous variations
on the idea and creating his own, unique blend of the two universes.
This gives him a clean slate to work with, and he uses it well.
Folks like Harry Knowles (the Colonel Kurtz of geekdom—an
association that I think he would take as a compliment) will
of course hate Anderson’s approach, because it is spitting
in the eyes of the fans who have waited for this film and wanted
to see the aliens and Predators fight the same way that they
fought in the fantasy scenarios that play in their heads. These
geeks will probably walk away quite disappointed—there
is nothing comic book-like or video game-esque to be found
here. But for the rest of us normal folks, here is a very entertaining
film that tells its story intelligently and develops some very
gripping action sequences that remind us of the best moments
in the previous films.
By my calculation, Alien vs. Predator is
a sequel to the two Predator films (which took place last decade)
and a prequel to the Alien saga (which took place in the far
future). That means that it should begin where the Predator
films ended and explain a few things that will successfully
lead us into the Alien films, and the film succeeds in both
of these tasks. The video games, comic books, etc. dealt with
some sort of futuristic apocalypse in which aliens plague the
earth and Predators hunt them as a test of their manhood. These
stories were big in spectacle and in testosterone. Anderson
sets his film in modern day and tries to make a film closer
to Ridley Scott’s original Alien—we
are given a claustrophobic, nightmarish setting in which humans
try to survive against monsters that creep out of the shadows.
And no testosterone. For a huge battle spectacle, this is a fairly
intimate film, and it certainly plays against our expectations.
Nobody ever successfully argued that a film that brought these
creatures together had to be epic, no matter what the geeks think.
The plot concerns a rich
businessman named Charles Bishop Weyland (Lance Henriksen)
who discovers a pyramid in Antarctica, two thousand feet under
the ice. This discovery could rewrite history, so he quickly
assembles a team of experts to accompany him into the ice,
including nature survivalist Alexa Woods (Sanaa Lathan) and
archeologist Sebastian de Rosa (Raoul Bova). Anderson spends
enough time as necessary to develop these characters into likable
people and establishing their environment as a cold, barren one.
Weyland and the others are certainly nothing new for action movies,
but they are likable, and Antarctica is acceptably cold, dark,
and empty—a perfect, unlikely battleground between aliens
and Predators. Lathan in particular is an acceptable foil for
Ripley, the heroine from the Alien films. Whereas Ripley
was a meek woman who grew bold, Lathan creates a bold character
who grows bolder. The result is a character that mirrors Ripley
but does not replicate her.
I will not say how the creatures
tie into this barren, ancient setting, but it is unexpected
and corny enough that we buy it, if for no other reason that
its sheer audacity. It doesn’t
cheat either, which is more than I can say about some the other
sequels. The underground pyramid itself is an inspired idea—its
tall, labyrinth walls are excellent work from good set designers,
who combine the ancient, jungle setting of Predator with
the mechanical backdrop of Alien. A particularly interesting
touch is how the Predators have designed the pyramid so that
the walls shift and reconfigure every ten minutes. Why this is,
I will not say; why they use human time, I can only guess. But
don’t think about it too much—it’s an inventive
idea that keeps both the characters and us on our toes. Just
go along with it.
I’m
not sure why Anderson came up with idea of placing a futuristic
showdown between two deadly alien species in such an unlikely,
intimate setting, but it certainly works. In fact, after watching
Anderson’s film, I wouldn’t have it
any other way. He effectively creates a scenario that presents
fresh ideas for the Predators and generates the familiar scares
of the aliens. Instead of having a vast jungle or city as their
hunting ground, the Predators have to demonstrate careful, contained
ingenuity in their closed in environment. The aliens are at home
in dark, confined places, and they remain in top form. The humans,
caught in the middle, must battle both species and the
ever-shifting, icy pyramid. It’s an inspired location,
and it allows plenty of suspense to seep in and settle under our skin.
The action starts quickly,
and once it does, it never lets up. Geeks have complained that
not enough suspense is built up around the two alien creatures—they
simply show up and start doing their thing. This is true, but
after six previous films to get us ready for this showdown,
how much more buildup could anyone want? I personally got tired
of the characters trying to figure out what was going on in
the previous films because after a few rounds, I already knew what was going on,
and these scenes were simply killing time. Anderson cuts to the
chase, but he does so with good writing that doesn’t compromise
the story, the human characters, or the familiar characteristics
of our not-so-friendly visitors.
The
battles between the humans, the aliens, and the Predators are
certainly inventive. The aliens maintain their quickness, slime,
and sheer killing power, and the Predators have all sorts of fun,
sci-fi gizmos to help them fight. Anderson adds some interesting
touches that distinguish his approach to these creatures from
the previous films—aliens with scars and grudges, and Predators
who form surprising truces—and combines them with familiar
archetypes that we are used to (chest-bursting, human sacrifices,
the Queen Alien, etc.). He also utilizes some very cool action
shots—the Predator’s mid-air thrust of a harpoon into
alien is alone worth the price of admission, and should even please
the geeks.
Certainly there are a few
obvious moments that we know must happen for the sake of homage.
These scenes include the obligatory alien appearing dead only
to jump back to life, and the routine finale when everyone
runs for their lives as the bomb’s
timer ticks down. But Anderson earns these little moments by
giving us truly spectacular scenes in which these two familiar
monsters fight to the death in a setting that no one could have
expected it to work so well in. By the time these little conventions
come, we expect them and, if we are familiar with the previous
films, we sort of want them. After all, who’s John Wayne
without his cowboy hat?
I think what I admire the most about Alien Vs. Predator is
the boldness that Anderson demonstrates in not giving into the
fantasies and influential pull of the geeks who make up so much
of this audience. This is a project with which he has his own
agenda, and it is one that he is clearly passionate about. The
touches that he includes reveal his affection for both franchises,
yet he has his own, unbiased story to tell that brings the beasts
together in a compelling way. Frankly, I’m tired of big-budget,
no-brained, futuristic action films (Chronicles of Riddick,
anyone?). That’s what the geeks wanted, and Anderson instead
delivers a small film of claustrophobia that actually contains
a fair amount of intelligence.
As a result, he makes a
film that reuses old conventions in a way that makes us realize
why we enjoyed them in the first place, in an original setting
that provides a lot of genuine scares. He translates his passion
and objectives well, when he could have easily given in and
made a film exclusively for the fans. But he has not—he had made a film that anyone will
be able to enjoy, including the geeks, if they can crawl off
of their pedestals and realize that this is Anderson’s Alien
Vs. Predator, not their own. After growing tired of the
Alien and Predator films, I knew that it was time for a change.
Who knew that it would be a film that actually brought them together?
Got cherry-flavored, Satan?
Cast:
Lance
Henrickson: Charles Bishop Weyland
Sanaa
Lathan: Alexa Woods
Raoul Bova:
Sebastian de Rosa
Colin Salmon:
Maxwell Stafford
Ewen
Bremner: Graeme Miller
A Twentieth Century Fox production. Written and directed by
Paul W. S. Anderson. Rated PG-13, for intense action and suspense,
gore/slime, and brief language. Running time: 111 minutes. Original
United States theatrical release date: August 13, 2004.