Il Fantasma dell'opera
0
out of ****
Life
is entirely too short and too beautiful to watch Dario Argento’s
“adaptation” of the oft-filmed Gaston Leroux novel
The Phantom of the Opera. Life is therefore also too
short to write a review for it, except for my urge to warn as
many people as I can to stay as far away as possible from this
depraved piece of trash: Do not to make the same mistake I did
as I browsed the shelves of Blockbuster and thought I had found
an off-beat variation of the classic tale. The DVD art, at least,
presented the film as a watchable, if melodramatic, interpretation.
“Off-beat,” I learned too late, scarcely does this
justice. For that matter, neither does “depraived piece
of trash.”
If
you have seen every version of Leroux’s novel except for
this one, then you have seen every version. Unless your idea of
a “version” includes sequences in which a non-disfigured
Phantom (Julian Sands) chops people up, bites out their tongues,
and assaults helpless persons for no rhyme or reason in all sorts
of grisly manners. In this adaptation, the Phantom was abandoned
at birth and raised by rats, with whom he has a telekinetic bond
(“I am not a phantom. I am a rat!”). There is a moment
in the film in which rats cover his body, and he unbuckles his
trousers and lets them run down his crotch. I wonder what Julian
Sands’ mother would have thought of this scene. To call this
the worst version of The Phantom of the Opera is an insult
to the true worst version (which I can’t specifically think
of now, but I am sure that it is National Film Registry material
next to this).
The
storyline is non-existent. Scenes of vulgar sexuality are interlaced
with scenes of characters wandering off into the Paris Opera House
sewers and meeting violent ends via the Phantom and his rats.
Both are shown in painstaking detail. Christine (Asia Argento,
the director’s daughter) figures in as the love of the Phantom’s
life, and yes, he is still obsessed with making her the star of
the opera. But this romantic storyline, the heart of the novel
and all subsequent film versions, plays like a very minor subplot
here. In its place, we inexplicably are given the story of a rat-catcher
(István Bubik) who is determined to destroy every rat in
Paris. He builds a car/machine that has propellers made out of
razor-blades, which he uses to chop up the squeaking rodents as
he laughs manically. We see rat abuse in as much gory detail as
you would expect, after which the machine hits a bump, its razor-blade
propellers fly through the air and—what do you want to bet
that there’s a decapitation in full detail? Well, there’s
a decapitation in full detail.
Watching
this pornographic display of sexism and violence made me feel
dirty, depressed, and totally ashamed that I had brought it into
my house. I confess that I didn’t finish it, but I watched
more than anyone ever need have to. There is not one redeeming
quality to this film—not in acting, direction, musical score,
nothing. Dario Argento has evidently made a great deal of these
types of film, some praised as masterpieces of atmosphere, others
dismissed as the trash that his Il Fantasma dell'opera
is. I’d only heard of the “masterpieces” before,
and I’ve learned my lesson to do more research before blindly
admitting an Italian horror director into my home. This is, admittedly,
the only film by Argento that I have seen, and it is the only
film by him that I ever intend to see. It is the working of a
sick, sick man who enjoys focusing on human suffering and sexual
violence. That he uses a classic story to exploit his perverted
obsessions makes him even more despicable, because I’m certain
that I’m not the only person who was fooled.
This
week (6/24/05), George A. Romero’s Land
of the Dead will be released in theaters all over the
United States. Romero, a (ahem) biting social commentator, utilizes
violence and gore to parody and lambaste the United States consumer
society. I have no objections to the use of gore and violence
on these levels, because there is method to the madness. Romero
intentionally goes too far and pushes the envelope because he
understands the effect that such images have on us. He utilizes
gore to shake us into action, to force us to realize that if there
is indeed a market for films like Dario Argento’s Il
Fantasma dell'opera, then we are a truly disturbed society.
Even The
Exorcist used its horrific images to create a story that
ultimately revealed human perseverance. In contrast, Il Fantasma
dell'opera only exists to make us feel despair, and to soften
our reaction to images of gore and violent sexuality as if it
is all something that we should accept and appreciate in cinema.
Argento also understands the effects that such images have on
us, and instead of exploiting it for good, he uses it to push
us farther along into desensitization. I shudder at the thought
of what a film such as this will look like in twenty years from
now. I don’t believe in censorship, but I think that any
studio that would agree to finance or release this garbage should
feel as ashamed about doing so as I did for watching it.
But
I’m determined to make it right in this review. If my description
of Il Fantasma dell'opera sounds like a good time to
you, then we’re both probably better off if you left my
website and never read my reviews again. If my description instead
made the film come across as the depravity that it is, then I
have done my job in warning you to stay away, even if you are
a Phantom purist. There is nothing pure here.
Please,
please do not watch this movie. If you see it in your rental store,
cover it up with another film. Write the managers and petition
that it at least be given a warning label. Do everything you can
to help your fellow man steer away from Dario Argento’s
Il Fantasma dell'opera. I beg you. I plead with you.
For this warning, you’re welcome. But I still don’t
feel any better having seen this vomit.
Sorry.
That last sentence undermines vomit. I’m not joking.
Cast:
Julian Sands: The Phantom
Asia Argento: Christine Daaé
Andrea Di Stefano: Baron Raoul De Chagny
István Bubik: Ignace, the rat-catcher
A Focus Film production. Directed
by Dario Argento. Written by Argento and Gérard Brach,
and having nothing at all to do with the novel by Gaston Leroux.
No M.P.A.A. rating, because they probably refused to touch it
with a four-mile pole. Running time: 99 minutes. Original Italian
theatrical release date: November 20, 1998.